[day 1] Campaign abuse by Sir R. McGentleman

Published on

Update on 19 January, 23:21 , French time : The author of the kickstarter page is editing and fixing the page to be compliant with CC-BY 4.0 international. Thanks for not reporting the page anymore. more updates on day 2 post ]


I do not endorse and I'm not involved as an author in the running Kickstarter campaign "Pepper and Carrot Volume 2" created by Sir Ricky McGentleman (even if the page can make you believe I'm part of it). The money invested on it benefit to Sir Ricky McGentleman, not me. I'm not against the commercial usage in this project, I'm against the non-respect of the license : (in short, endorsement of original creator, no indication when changes are made, missing attributions for translators, wrong link to the license). I requested Kickstarter to take down the page for this reasons.

- Violations details: noted on a screenshot here - License of Pepper&Carrot: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationnal Kickstater doesn't reply my report and the creator of the page ignores my recommendations. I feel abused... It affect my productivity and inspiration. Can you help me by sharing, reporting the page and make noise?... Thank you,

- David Revoy

License: "[day 1] Campaign abuse by Sir R. McGentleman" by David Revoy − CC-BY 4.0
Tags:  #derivation  #drama   | Download: Markdown


link LuckyLuigi  

Reported on kickstarter

link David Revoy Author,

@LuckyLuigi : thank you

link nathan Salapat  

I've reported this to Kickstarter as well.

link David Revoy Author,

@nathan Salapat : thank you

link DansLeRuSH  

Signalé aussi, par contre Kickstarter me met le message suivant (j'ai coché "atteinte à la propriété intellectuelle") : « Seules les demandes formulées par le titulaire du droit d'auteur ou de la marque déposée seront traitées »

link cat4rent  

I have reported this too. I really hope they're going to do something about it, this is outrageous.

link David Revoy Author,

@DansLeRuSH : Merci. Je vois. Ca va être difficile. Peut-être que l'attention médiatique leur feront retrouver mon rapport plus rapidements.

link David Revoy Author,

@cat4rent : I hope too! thank you for your time on it.

link Pat David  

I've reported the project as well. For anyone with a kickstarter account, you can report the project to kickstarter here, under the FAQ section:


link mva  

Done (I've reported the project to the KS), although, it seems author do specified you as original "art and story author", lol.

So sad, that such scam doing KS discreditation :(

link Demi  

I took a little moment earlier to write a few words up onto the Kickstarter comments section, simply to let both backers and possible backers know what is happening, so hopefully this may possibly help the situation a little too, at the least whilst the reports claim is being handelled

link Frémo  

Salut David, j'ai signalé ça sur Kickstarter comme revente du travail d'autrui (je n'ai pas noté le terme exact, désolé) en mettant un lien vers ton screenshot.

Ne laisse pas miner par ça même s'il faut bien entendu rester ferme vis-à-vis de cet abus.
Bon courage.


link barefootguru  

Reported to Kickstarter, and sent message to Ricky. Stay strong David! Love both your comic and your openness to sharing — when people don't try to rip you off.

link neomonkeus  

Looks like it may not be his first time either - https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1627457613/help-print-the-full-color-webcomic-pepper-and-carr/

link David Revoy Author,

@Pat David : Thank you Pat David for the link and for the report.

@mva : Thank you. Yes, sad.

@Demi : This will help a lot, thank you for writing it in the comment of this Kickstarter campaign. Sorry if the promise of a printed copy will be removed. I'm right now discussing with the Krita Foundation and Blender Foundation for a printed version with all benefit going to only free software I'm using ( from Linux system Ubuntu and Mint to Krita, Gmic, Inkscape Gimp, Mypaint, smaller projects to, as percent ).

@Frémo : Merci pour le soutient et le signalement! Je vais essayer de rester zen et reprendre la prod du future épisode 14.

@barefootguru : Thank you, and thanks for your encouragements and nice words.

link Ron  

I did not read anything on the Kickstarter that made me think that there was an "endorsement".

Furthermore, on your own 'philosophy' page you state that "You just need to credit my name - David Revoy - as the author." That has been done.

If you want a more restrictive license, I suggest you use it. This seems to be a fair and interesting use of CC-By to me.

link David Revoy Author,

@neomonkeus : Yes. I had already trouble with this Kickstarter creator about the previous kickstarter. I pretended that was 'sort of right' after a fix and decided to not really look at it further. I feel guilty now about it of being OK with this first Kickstarter even if it was borderline with the rules. ( you can read all previous story about it here : http://www.peppercarrot.com/article280/ninjaknightcomics-publishing-kickstarter ).

link David Revoy Author,

@Ron : I understand the possible confusion about Philosophy page.
It was written in a time were I was working alone on Pepper&Carrot. Nowaday, I have a team of corrector and translator and they deserve to be credited too.
It has to be fixed. It will not be instant fix because the website is translated into many langages.

The license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ is short, and explain really well a set of rules.
Also, I recommended personnaly in a email discution to Sir Ricky McGentleman how to make a page that please the license, and I had no feedback about it.
It's not any fun to me to do this type of blog post, you know...

link Vivek Gite  

Reported and upvoted on Reddit too :)

link Anna  

I sympathize with you Mr. Revoy! I think McGentleman is taking advantage of artists who do not speak English fluently. He has a lot of Kickstarters that look similar.

But, please consider changing your Creative Commons license. It gives the impression that anyone may use your work to profit themselves, and what constitutes "attribution" is vague. You will only continue to have misunderstandings at this rate.

link ellvis  

Hi David, I just posted this to Diaspora (the only social network I use), good luck with this and wish you this to happen as few as possible!

link David Revoy Author,

@Vivek Gite : Thank you for the repost on Reddit!

@Anna : Thank you for the nice message. I understand. I need to explain the CC-By better. But in this case the author of the kickstarter is playing borderline with the rules to cheat. It's hard.

@ellvis : Thank you for the repost on Diaspora!

link Amic  

Bon courage pour ce mauvais moment. Et même s’il faisait simplement proprement le boulot d’attribuer la bonne licence, c’est de toute façon pas très sympa de ne même pas noter quelque part qu’on peut te supporter sur patreon.

Apparemment il y a des gens qui se plaignent de n’avoir rien reçu de bien correct pour la campagne précédente, ça sent l’arnaque à plein nez son truc… Étonnant qu’il ait eu autant de monde en si peu de jours.

J’espère que le bruit fera au moins suffisamment le buzz pour t’apporter d’autres soutiens sur patreon ou tipeee. Je pense que c’est sur ça qu’il faut insister : si vous voulez vraiment soutenir l’auteur, il y a moyen de le faire, tout est prêt !

link Nicholas Evans  

David, how did you try to contact Kickstarter? Was it through the dmca page? DMCA is US law that requires websites to remove content that violates copyright. I would hope that Kickstarter would respond quickly to a proper DMCA claim: https://www.kickstarter.com/help/forms/dmca/new

link Julian Calaby  


Your grudging endorsement of the previous kickstarter this guy has run for Pepper and Carrot: http://www.peppercarrot.com/fr/article280/ninjaknightcomics-publishing-kickstarter might have given him the idea that you were ok with him doing this.

Would you be able to share more of your side of the story about that particular Kickstarter?

link moozaad  

hasn't he done exactly the same with 'volume 1' https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1627457613/help-print-the-full-color-webcomic-pepper-and-carr/description and several other web comics? Look at his history. :/

link Julian Calaby  

@moozaad I just did some research on exactly that.

GhostBlade and We Go Forward appear to have been done with permission / approval: the authors of those webcomics have posted links to the Kickstarters on their personal sites, and David gave his grudging approval to the Pepper and Carrot Volume 1 Kickstarter. (Link in my previous comment.)

Psychedelic Rainbow looks shifty as the backers are complaining about the quality of the artwork in the book in a way that indicates that the artwork was ripped from the web, and the author was _very_ silent about it, with this being the only comment he made that I could find: http://emperpep.tumblr.com/search/kickstarter

My reading of this is that "Sir Ricky McGentlemen" is setting up Kickstarters then trying to get the permission or approval of the authors. Not exactly a nice way to go about it, and in this case, he's made some factual and license compliance issues which make the entire thing very dubious.

link lof  

So i tried to understand how this might happened. And apart of the attribution for the translation i found a possible answer for the discrepancy between version 3.0 and 4.0 of the license.

On your website you link to version 4.0 so no mistakes can be made there.

But if we look at the sources on github we see that version 3.0 of CC-BY is linked for

* https://github.com/Deevad/peppercarrot_ep06_translation
* https://github.com/Deevad/peppercarrot_ep02_translation
* https://github.com/Deevad/peppercarrot_ep03_translation
* others

And CC-BY 4.0 for

* https://github.com/Deevad/peppercarrot_ep13_translation
* https://github.com/Deevad/peppercarrot_ep12_translation
* others

So if we imagine that this person started by looking at the early episodes we can presume that he might overlooked the change of license later on.

This does not excuse the lack of communication or lack of attribution for the translator(s), but it is a reasonable assumption.

About the text in this blog post:

Please correct me if i am wrong, but shouldn't you mention that Pepper and Carrot is in fact licenses CC-BY 3.0 and CC-BY 4.0 depending on the episodes?

Or how does this work for combined works with different CC versions?

link Alessander  

I have reported this too. I hope it works, as the selection seems to vanish when reloading the website of the Kickstarter campaign.

I understand that you had a hard work doing a "Printer-friendly full refactoring" [1] of some episodes, and that it must be quite disappointing to see your work cropped and deformed without any indication of the changes made, as required by the CC BY 4.0 license :-(

Good luck and keep up the great work!

[1] http://peppercarrot.com/en/article343/printer-friendly-full-refactoring

link Graham  

That's lousy behaviour, especially his failure to communicate with you David. That says it all. He just wants to exploit the free culture movement and not be part of it. It would be worth considering that a license should require explicit up-front statements that a creator has not endorsed the usage.

Anyway I'm sorry you're going through it, again, when you have approached this is such a spirit of openness and generosity. He didn't have to do anything but abide by the license conditions to take in his un-deserved profits, and I'm sure many backers assume this is an endorsed project whether or not it says so.

I hope his project gets taken down on his failure to cite the right license and acknowledge all creators.

He could do this whole thing so differently...

link Meredith  

I saw a comment on the kickstarter linking here. I feel bad I backed the first one but I was under the impression you'd approved (because of the other post) and it was OK. I was not planning on backing it because I was disappointed in printing quality of the book. I think if you were involved it would have been printed better. I've seen many times that "publishers" don't understand how to format art correctly.

link Meredith  

Yes, filing a DMCA report is the best thing to do (David has to do this, not anyone else).
You can use one of these and fill in the info https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/stock-letters/

link Raghavendra Kamath  

Reported on kickstarter. I Hope the issue get sorted soon.

link Mike  

Yup, you want to file a DMCA takedown notice. The "Report" link doesn't do that.

If that doesn't work, contact Jonathon Bailey <jonathan@plagiarismtoday.com>. His business is handling this kind of thing. But it is a business for him, so he may bill you.

link CD  

I was also mistaken that you were okay with it and was a backer of the old one, I'd much rather support you or a charity of your choosing for a better book.

Message sent, commented (on the original) and reported. Stay strong David. You're doing great things for the open internet!

link Tom Head  

David I've spread the word, and went to Kickstarter. It looks like some changes have been made, i.e. mentioning that you don't endorse this, proper link to cc by 4.0, mention that the artwork has been edited, and recognition of the English translator on the pictures anyway. This is what he should have done in the first place of course. Is your goal to get this canceled still? It is easy for him to comply now that he has met his goal.

link Willem  

This clearly violates the non-endorsement clause in the CC BY 4.0 license and the attribution requirements.

Besides, it is also an unethical thing to sell prints of an entire comic series for profit, without at least contacting the creator first. Even if that were legal, I would be shocked by it, and it is also contrary to the spirit of Kickstarter.

By the way, your plan to publish an official printed version with profits going to you and the open-source projects used seems great to me!

link DukeBG  

Reported to kickstarter

link David Revoy Author,

@Julian Calaby :

>> Would you be able to share more of your side of the story about that particular Kickstarter?

Thanks for your research. Yes, you are right about the situation. I have to summarize the full story : At the first Kickstater ( Mai 2015 ), I knew the situation a bit before launch then I discovered the page a bit late ( the thing was already 'staff pick' on Kickstarter ), but I wasn't confident enough to bring attention to this. Pepper&Carrot project was still very young, not my main job and I was more in the spirit "bah .... It's not that important, and being 'staff pick' on kickstarter is still a cool advertisement for my growing project". Yes, I was surprised Pepper&Carrot could make a little success on Kickstarter. So, I had very mixed feeling, and it was hard to think clearly. The original page made by MrGentleman didn't had any attribution at all and was *very* infringing. We had email about it, and I had to treat him to fix the page. He did a sort of half-fix, blury communication, and I sort of pretended I was 'happy' with it. That's what you could read on your research about the first Kickstarter campaign.
When two weeks ago, MrGentleman sent me an email about starting "Pepper&Carrot volume 2 on Kickstarter" . I was a bit more confident : I sent him a long email with all recommendations to this time stick to the CC-By 4.0. Because I had regret about the first campaign. I was firm on all recommendation to establish a real project compliant with the license. I wanted to be proud of this and fix the problems met on the first Kickstater ... In the result , he just posted a copy/paste of the first campaign, almost not modified. A facepalm situation. So, I decided he was making fun of me, not respecting the project and reported the page to Kickstarter ( filling a full DMCA ). After a couple of days, I stil had no answers. The situation was really frustrating to me as I was running on the same situation from the first campaign.
That's why I decided to write this post to at least prevent the incoming traffic from Kickstarter about the situation.

I receive patronage from NKcomic. ( Sir MrGentleman pretends to be from NKcomic , but I can't proove, email don't match ) To be full transparent: 20$ per episode , 220$ sponsored so far.
He doesn't use NKcomic as a name on Kickstarter because previous NKcomic account on Kickstarter is closed and contain his real name ( https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/56168867/imagine-an-anthology-of-creator-owned-comics/creator_bio" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" title="https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/56168867/imagine-an-anthology-of-creator-owned-comics/creator_bio">https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/56 … reator_bio )
Why using a fake name on Kickstater? Why it's not the NinjaKnight website linked in his profile? Why http://www.ninjaknightcomics.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" title="http://www.ninjaknightcomics.com/">http://www.ninjaknightcomics.com/ website is not mentioning Pepper&Carrot after a full year ?
There is too much confusion around his profile to trust him...
And even if he is NKcomic ; it's very false to believe patronage gives him special privilege to bypass the license of Pepper&Carrot, or pretends endorsement.

Here I have nothing to hide.

link Arne Brix  

I reported it too.
It seems he made small changes to the wording of the page.
In the comment section he now claims, that he has resolved the issues with you.
That doesn't seem likely to me since he didn't address your main critique points, but it could fool people just looking on the comments section.

link David Revoy Author,

@Arne Brix :

>> It seems he made small changes to the wording of the page.

Thanks you for your report Arne, Yes, he started editing the page. Things are moving now and his page should be soon compatible with the CC-By license.

link David Revoy Author,

@Meredith :
>> I feel bad I backed the first one [...] I was disappointed in printing quality of the book.

Thank you for confirming this, and no problem for backing the first one. I didn't backed it myself, and wasn't a part of it so I never knew the about the quality.
Feel free to send photos about the final product. Thank you.

link DukeBG  

Somewhere in the last hour / half an hour the Kickstarter acted and the project page is now replaced with "Pepper and Carrot Volume 2 is the subject of an intellectual property dispute and is currently unavailable. If you are interested in this project, please check back later. Thanks for your patience."

link David Revoy Author,

From https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1627457613/pepper-and-carrot-volume-2/comments?cursor=12264647#comment-12264646" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" title="https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1627457613/pepper-and-carrot-volume-2/comments?cursor=12264647#comment-12264646">https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/16 … t-12264646, to answer comment to Sir Ricky McGentleman :

>> [Sir Ricky McGentleman about 4 hours ago ] We also contact the Kickstarter staff and made the changes they recommend have been made as well. Thank you kindly.

I sent an email with adjustment. The page will be compatible only after this minor last remaining changes.
Good to see you are answering my email now and start to respect my recommendation.
Should I need **each time** to treat you to get your project compliant with CC-By ?!
Adjust the page, and I'll close the story.

to quote my email :
You still need to fix : "English trasnslation by Mike King." on the first picture should be "English translation by Amireeti"
And when you claim "Orginal art modified by NK Comics." tell how you modified. If not modified ( just scaling ), remove the sentence. ( Look at the best practice if you are a bit lost :
https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Best_practices_for_attribution#This_is_a_good_attribution_for_material_you_modified_slightly" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" title="https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Best_practices_for_attribution#This_is_a_good_attribution_for_material_you_modified_slightly">https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/B … d_slightly ) Also, you still not introduce yourself, ( eg. " Hi, my name is Sir Ricky McGentleman , and I'm part of NKComic. We are a group of editor, publisher, and printer by an independent publishers." ) : It's important for the audience to know who you are and helps to figure what type of Kickstarter project you offer.


>> [Creator Sir Ricky McGentleman about 5 hours ago] This is incorrect. We have been donating money to the creator and have been in contact with him since before we started. We have been reaching out to Daivd to correct this. Thanks

If by 'We' you refer to NinjaKnightComic , I received this : 20$ per episode , 220$ sponsored so far ( with all month ) via Patreon. It's from another email than your.
http://www.ninjaknightcomics.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" title="http://www.ninjaknightcomics.com/">http://www.ninjaknightcomics.com/ do not mention Pepper&Carrot, NinjaKnight comic on Kickstarter is a deleted account. ( https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/56168867/imagine-an-anthology-of-creator-owned-comics/creator_bio" rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" title="https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/56168867/imagine-an-anthology-of-creator-owned-comics/creator_bio">https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/56 … reator_bio ). Admit the situation is fishy and don't feel honest.
Patreon is not a royalty system in disguise; I don't receive on it a percent from your Kickstarter project and I'm not interested to receive it because it's not about the money, and your business is dirty and I have testimony your product is bad quality now. I'm not interested to get Pepper&Carrot printed by you.
I never asked for you for patronage. NinjaKnightComic did it spontaneously way before the first Kickstarter campaign and I was happy about it.
Claiming afterward it's a royalty in desguise is plain wrong.
Being a patron of Pepper&Carrot don't give you right to bypass the Creative Commons license.
**You are not owning Pepper&Carrot right because you patron me** and because I'm receiving patronage is not a proof I'm associated or I endorse your project.

link David Revoy Author,

@DukeBG : Thank you DukeBG for bringing the good news. I updated all informations in a new post here: http://www.peppercarrot.com/en/article348/day-2-kickstarter-campaign-news

link GuyFromKickstarter  

I don't normally do this at all, but you're one of the artist I respected for many years, I went out of my way to email Kickstarter and report the project to have it taken down. Reselling your work without your consent is unacceptable.

link David Revoy Author,

@GuyFromKickstarter : Thank you. Thank you a lot for taking action and your nice words. They mean a lot to me right now in this problem.

link Remo Dentato  

I wrote to Kickstarter as well. I'm a backer of many projects and I pointed out to them that this project hurts their credibility as crowdfunding platform. I believe that the more emails they get the more they will feel motivated to act.

link David Revoy Author,

@Remo Dentato : Thank you Remo for taking action.
Yes, Kickstarter and all the open-sources projects, artist and creators have a long win-win common history.
It would be sad to see them becoming a polluted crowdfunding platform.
I also don't want to see shadows on Kickstarter brand.

link thedigitalDog  

reported as well. this should not happen.

link Frank O  

It looks like he is fully compliant with CC-BY, plus has ceded to many of your demands that are beyond that license... If you want to prevent this, you should probably release under CC-BY-NC (noncommercial version), or honestly a non-CC license.

The actions you're taking actually violate the CC-BY license more than what he is doing ("No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.")

link David Revoy Author,

@Frank O : I disagree. Can you quote 'the actions' I do to violate the CC-By in your opinion ? Never too late to fix them. Thank you.
( note: yes, the author is fixing the page, I also made a new blog post today )

link Sean Tilley  

Reported this - I will also post this to my networks. I'm a huge supporter of Creative Commons works, but I'm thoroughly disgusted to see people try to profit off of work that is not their own.

link Julian Calaby  

@David Revoy, thanks for clearing that up! I'll comment further on your new post.

link Frank O  

@David REVOY : You're attempting to limit what appears to be an entirely legitimate use of CC-BY. Perhaps there was a worse version before I saw it, but when I saw that kickstarter for the first time, it stated who did the art and did not expressly say anything about the artist's involvement.

Why don't you release under a less-free license?

link David Revoy Author,

@Frank O : Yes, the version you saw was almost compliant with the CC-By (already edited by the author of the page after the public exposure). Kickstarter was puting pressure on the author to fix the page, but he already had a full week of exposure with very infringing presentation, and 180 backers misinformed. The first version clearly was an attempt to steal my identity, Backers were supporting the page to support 'me' and 'Pepper&Carrot' as an artist proposing his creation, and were not informed they supported 'him' as a publisher doing stuff with a free ressources. He was also breaking Kickstarter rules, had already an old account closed, not using real name, etc... So, a lot of issue on multiple levels and true ; the fight was extended to many field, not only the one about the respect of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

I'll not change my CC-By usage. I'm fine with it, I like it, and from Sintel to Chaos&Evolutions to Pepper&Carrot , I'm strong of years of managing it and knowing my right with it. If you read it https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ , you'll see it already tries to prevent this type of 'endorsement' issue. You can see here more than 10 other community projects made with this license : http://www.peppercarrot.com/en/categorie4/derivations . As I told before ; in this case, the problem was not the license, but was the guy. I'm also preparing a french printed version right now for the french libraries with a publisher, and all work really smooth.

I hope this answer to your doubts about my actions.

Post a reply

The comments on this article are archived and unfortunately not yet connected to a dedicated post on Mastodon. Feel free to continue the discussion on the social media of your choice. Link to this post:

You can also quote my account so I'll get a notification.
(eg. @davidrevoy@framapiaf.org on my Mastodon profile.)